|CITY OF BRENTWOOD
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
Minutes of January 22, 2002
A regular meeting
of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Brentwood was called to
order at 11:02 p.m. in the Community Room at Summerset III, located
at 1680 Regent Drive, Brentwood, CA 94513.
Present: Members Beckstrand, Gomes, Hill, Petrovich, Chairman McPoland
AGENDA REVIEW - None
CITIZEN COMMENTS- None
1. Approve Minutes of January 8, 2002.
2. Approve Warrant Nos. 62016, 62038, 62073, 62148, 62249.
3. Approve Resolution No. RA 38 amending the appointments of staff
to serve as Agency Officials and approve Resolution No. RA 39 amending
the designation of positions for the Conflict of Interest Code.
It was moved/seconded by Gomes/Beckstrand to approve consent calendar
items 1-3 as approved by staff. Motion carried unanimously.
4. Conflict of interest issues regarding Agency Members in relationship
to proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment process
Gina Rozenski, Redevelopment Analyst, explained that based on the
results of the previous action to obtain a quorum, Members Beckstrand,
Gomes and Chairman McPoland would be voting on the next agenda item.
5. Approve a Resolution accepting the Proposed Amendments to the Preliminary
Plans for Brentwood and North Brentwood Redevelopment Project Areas,
authorizing Agency Staff to file information with appropriate taxing
agencies and officials, and directing the amendments to the official
Redevelopment Plans be prepared
Gina Rozenski, Redevelopment Analyst, introduced the recommendation
of staff to accept the proposed amendments to the preliminary plans
for Brentwood and North Brentwood Redevelopment Project Areas, which
was adopted by the Planning Commission on October 23, 2001. Ms Rozenski
further explained that the preliminary plan is a very brief document
outlining things such as building densities, population densities
within the project areas, land use, boundaries, etc.
RESOLUTION NO. RA 40
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF BRENTWOOD
ACCEPTING THE AMENDMENTS TO THE PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR THE BRENTWOOD
AND NORTH BRENTWOOD PROJECT AREAS, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
TO FILE INFORMATION WITH APPROPRIATE TAXING AGENCIES AND OFFICIALS,
AND DIRECTING THE AMENDMENTS TO THE OFFICIAL REDEVELOPMENT PLANS TO
It was moved/seconded by Gomes/Beckstrand that the full reading of
Resolution RA 40 be waived and that the same be adopted as recommended
by staff. Motion passed by the following vote:
AYES: Members Beckstrand, Gomes, Chairman McPoland (qualified voting
ABSTAINED: Members Hill, Petrovich
6. Solicitation of comments regarding Request for Qualifications and
Proposals for the Downtown Parking Study.
Gina Rozenski, Redevelopment Analyst, solicited comments regarding
Request for Qualifications and Proposals for the Downtown Parking
Study. Ms. Rozenski proposed four downtown areas for possible parking
· The northeast corner of Oak Street & Brentwood Blvd.
· The northwest corner of Oak Street & First Street.
· The southwest corner of Oak Street & First Street.
· An area behind businesses on First Street adjacent to the First
Street City Lot.
Mayor McPoland stated that he felt it was very important to have a
joint Council or Agency/Planning Commission meeting to discuss the
Downtown Specific Plan rather than just move forward with a parking
Member Hill commented that he felt the area on the corner of Oak and
Walnut might be another area of study.
Chairman McPoland suggested the quadrant including Rich’s Drive-In
should be extended all the way to the corner.
The Agency directed staff to extend the parking area on the northeast
corner of Oak Street and Brentwood Blvd. to the corner, include the
lot on the corner of Walnut and Oak as a fifth option and choose a
consultant for the Downtown Parking Plan, so that they can work in
conjunction with the planning Commission, Council and the consultant
for the Downtown Specific Plan.
7. Solicitation of comments regarding Request for Qualifications for
the Downtown Specific Plan.
The Agency directed staff to choose a consultant for the Downtown
Specific Plan so they can work in conjunction with the Planning Commission,
Council and the consultant for the Downtown Parking Plan
CITIZEN COMMENTS - none
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS FROM AGENCY MEMBERS - none
REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - none
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 11:15
Deputy City Clerk