Brentwood City Hall

Our home pageContact UsPrevious Page

Central Park Gazebo


Meeting Date: January 22, 2002

Subject/Title: Approve appropriation of City of Brentwood’s proportionate share of cost for the Contra Costa: Shaping Our Future Study. 

Submitted by: Mitch Oshinsky, AICP, Community Development Director

Approved by: John Stevenson, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appropriate $13,981 (the City’s proportionate share), and participate in the Shaping Our Future Study.

PREVIOUS ACTION: At their meeting of May 22, 2001, the City Council voted not to participate in the Contra Costa: Shaping Our Future Study. On December 11, 2001, Mayor Julie Pierce of the City of Clayton made a presentation to the City Council regarding participation in the Study.

COMMENTS: Attached is a report to the City Council, dated May 22, 2001, which provides some background on the Shaping Our Future Study. Also attached are a letter from the City Manager of Concord, the Agreement for Professional Services for the consultant who will manage the Study, and a Detailed Scope of Work for the Study. 

At their May 22, 2001 meeting, the City Council voted to not participate in the Shaping Our Future study. At that time, the Study discussed committees, but did not define the membership of those. It also appeared to give the public the role of selecting the preferred alternative, but it was unclear who would make the final decision. I felt those questions should be answered before we joined in. 

The City of Concord apparently had similar questions, and referred them to the Steering Committee, which made the requested changes. The Policy Committee now consists of one representative from each City Council, and two members of the County Board of Supervisors. The Management Committee consists of four City Managers, the County Administrator, and the Executive Director of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority. It now appears that the final decision will be made by a combination of the public and elected officials. 

With these questions having been resolved, it is recommended that the City participate in this Study for development of a future vision and growth management strategy for Contra Costa County. 

FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for this Study will be divided equitably among developer fees.


Meeting Date: May 22, 2001

Subject/Title: Mayors Conference Visioning Proposal

Submitted by: Jon Elam, City Manager

Approved by: Jon Elam, City Manager

Council to discuss, and determine whether to join, not join, or seek further information on becoming a participant in the Contra Costa County Mayors’ Conference County Visioning Process, at a cost not to exceed $14,000.00.

For much of the last two years representatives for the County City Managers’ Group (PMA) and the County Advisory Committee of the Mayors’ Conference have been attempting to develop a County-wide Visioning Plan. The leadership of this effort has come from the Central County area and has had little input from Brentwood or far East County.

This group has now contacted the Mayor and asked the City to contribute $13,900.00 toward a study plan being developed by the firm of Fregonese-Calthorpe Associates. The attached work plan outlines what would be done. It appears very comprehensive and progressive. It discusses “steering” and “policy” committees, but does not define the membership of those. It also appears to give the public the role of selecting the preferred alternative, but it’s unclear who will make the final decision. These questions should be answered before we join in. Much of it is for a County-wide plan to do what the City has spent considerable funds on in updating Brentwood’s General Plan. The goal is not a County master plan, but a framework for city, county and state government coordination of actions through agreed upon policy.

The outcome of all of the proposed workshops and research is a plan for three infill sites, a preferred alternative and a report that would culminate in each participating City becoming a part of a County Compact on Growth Management. This is outlined under Section 8.3 of the proposal and if the City signs on, it suggests we would agree to six bullet points that would be integrated into our own General Plan.

Staff finds this effort to make county-wide planning the same for all cities quite a challenge. To have representatives for 18 other county-cities create and adopt Growth Management policies that would dictate to Brentwood where development should occur would be amazing, and I would think unlikely. 

On the other hand, the politics to not join with your fellow communities also would seem to pose a problem, since we are often portrayed as being independent. Also, being involved would give us a voice in the process and outcome. I added this for your own discussion and direction.

Top of Page